{"success":1,"onion":[{"id":"335397","titolo":"Re: Do you think 'History' debunks things on its own?","ricetta":"[Online \/ 2019-11-27] Re: Do you think 'History' debunks things on its own?\nThreaded index\nDate index\nFAQ\nRe: Do you think 'History' debunks things on its own?\nPosted by James Cantor on 2017-June-23 12:01:50, Friday\nIn reply to Re: Do you think 'History' debunks things on its own? posted by anonymous on 2017-June-23 11:50:49, Friday\nHere is Filip's thinly veiled attempt to influence it:\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Hebephilia#age_of_girls_in_the_Tanner-stages\nOne way to start winning friends is, of course, to be decent to them.\nThe current strategies most common here do only the opposite.\nNo one who is pedophilophobic would read anything here that might change their minds.\nFollow ups:\nMany of us have given up on trying to change. . . - Will Robinson 2017-June-23 13:42:13, Friday\n(0)\nRe: Do you think 'History' debunks things on its own? - Ellen 2017-June-23 13:12:12, Friday\n(7)\nRe: Do you think 'History' debunks things on its own? - James Cantor 2017-June-23 13:14:42, Friday\n(6)\nRe: Do you think 'Hi...","url":"http:\/\/r2j4xiyckibnyd45.onion\/messages\/1498904.htm"}]}